ACCU-CHECK Active Meter

By John Crowley Added at March 12, 2008 Views 580 Reviews 6 0.0 stars

Features the basic 1.0 microliter sample size and 5 second result time as well as approved alternate-site testing.

  • Report Report as inappropriate
  • Rate 0.0 stars
  • Share
    Email Email
    Print Print Twitter Twitter
    Facebook Facebook

Reviews (6 reviews)

Add your review Reply Down
Hinboyz3
Hinboyz3 November 21, 2009 at 7:40 pm   

I like this one because of the ease to use, and such a small sample is needed.

MISS PAM
MISS PAM September 25, 2008 at 7:54 pm   

This is the third meter I tried. It works fine and as far as expense it's cheaper for test strips than others I tried.

Pros

Price

MAMA J
MAMA J August 30, 2008 at 3:46 pm   

like this meter. very affordable

midget
midget August 27, 2008 at 12:09 pm   

I used this meter for 4 years and never had a problem with it

tmana
tmana May 20, 2008 at 1:12 am   

This was my first meter. I found the amount of blood I could get from a prick varied, and the meter would sometimes give different readings depending on how much blood got on the "window" area of the strip. I tried the "alternate site testing" option, but the lancing device could never draw up enough blood for the monitor. After a bit under a year, it started having trouble accepting the strips completely.

Pros

It has very inexpensive supplies for a name-brand meter, and a quick response. It also supports alternate site testing (forearm).

Cons

Readings varied depending on how full one could get the strip. Reading method (photoluminescence?) is supposed to be the least accurate of the three main methods used. After a bit under a year, the device started having trouble accepting the strips completely. Also, its alternate-site testing option never worked correctly for me.

Guffey
Guffey May 2, 2008 at 11:32 am   

I like this meter a lot—I try various types but this is the only one I have more than one of.

Pros

quick results, accurate, inexpensive test strips